"Environmentalism should be regarded on the same level with religion "as the only compelling, value-based narrative available to humanity," according to a paper written two years ago to influence the future strategy of the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), the world's would-be environmental watchdog."
It's the words "only," and "available," which worry me. Is UNEP going to attempt to replace religious values with its own? And what is UNEP's "value-based narrative?" Religions attempt to give mankind perspective on several key issues, such as, "Where did we come from (before this life)," "Why are we here," and, "After this life, where are we going?" Will the UNEP "value-based narrative" answer these questions? If folks find the answers, shall we say, less than satisfactory, will UNEP leave people free to explore and practice their own spirituality, and seek answers elsewhere? Will UNEP allow for the "availability" of other religions, or will it attempt to quash them with its own doctrine?
I don't know. Seems like old, red Communism, with a new, green makeover.